NIS2: Turning Policy into Behaviour Change

NIS2 is changing how organisations are held accountable for cyber security. It’s no longer enough to show that compliance policies exist or that training has been completed. Regulators now want evidence that security controls work in practice.

Why NIS2 Exists

NIS2 reflects a simple reality: cyber risk is increasing, and human behaviour is often at the centre of it. 

While the original directive helped establish baseline standards, it didn’t fully account for how organisations operate in practice. 

NIS2 responds by shifting the focus from having controls in place to proving they work. 

Small gradient.

The Compliance Gap

Most organisations believe they’re prepared for NIS2. They have policies, frameworks, and annual awareness training in place. But there’s a gap between compliance and reality. 

  • 68% of CISOs say employees are their biggest security risk  
  • 77% lack a clear model to reduce human risk  
  • 75% say employees don’t fully understand their role in security  
  • 78% say leaders don’t fully understand employee-related risk  

This is the challenge NIS2 exposes: security readiness on paper doesn’t always translate into secure behaviour. 

Small gradient.

What NIS2 Actually Requires

Beyond the regulatory language, NIS2 is asking organisations to demonstrate 4 things:

Risk is actively managed, not assumed

Leadership is accountable for effectiveness

Controls are proven to work over time

Number 4

Human behaviour is part of risk management

Stay Ahead of Cyber Threats

Close the Gap Between
Policy and Behaviour

Understand what NIS2 really means in practice and how to bridge the gap between policy and real-world employee behaviour. Discover what “good” actually looks like and how to apply it across your organisation.