Human Risk Is Shared. Is Your Approach?
Human Cyber Risk Doesn’t Belong to One Team
Human cyber risk reaches across entire organisations. Security manages cyber risk, HR shapes employee behaviour and culture, IT secures systems and access, while leadership sets business priorities and resources.
Each function influences risk in a different way, yet responsibility isn’t always shared or clearly understood. Different teams work towards different objectives, measure different outcomes and balance competing priorities, making it difficult to build a joined-up view of human cyber risk.
Our latest infographic explores the Human Risk Alignment Gap and reveals:
- Why human cyber risk requires shared ownership across the organisation
- Where cross-functional alignment and accountability break down
- How disconnected ownership leads to disconnected decisions
- Why only 24% of organisations operate a mature, integrated approach to human risk management
- How organisations can build a more coordinated approach to reducing human cyber risk
Go Beyond the Infographic
Explore the Full Research on
Human Cyber Risk
The Human Risk Alignment Gap is one of the key findings from our latest Rethinking Human Cyber Risk research.
Based on insights from 200 CISOs across the UK, France, Germany and Sweden, the research explores why human cyber risk remains difficult to manage when responsibility is spread across Security, HR, IT, Compliance and leadership.
Discover the barriers preventing greater cross-functional alignment, why current human risk reporting often fails to support better decision-making, and how organisations can move towards shared ownership, clearer measurement and a more integrated approach to managing human cyber risk.
